ࡱ> JLI bjbj߁ 6__$|||||$PL<42&pm2o2o2o2o2o2o247o2|o2||42F||m2m2~./iPG4F)/ Y2202I/^8\H^80/^8|/ho2o2@2^8X B: ҵ College of Arts and Sciences Simplified Faculty Evaluation Form (revised October 2025) Please use this form for tenured faculty (Associate and Full Professors). To Evaluation Committee Members: In keeping with the University policy on confidentiality, please do not circulate drafts of this evaluation by email. To the Faculty Member: Section 3.3 of the Faculty Handbook specifies that you may provide a written response to this evaluation and such response shall become part of your personnel file. The College permits faculty to appeal the numeric score assigned in their annual or multiyear departmental evaluations following the procedure outlined in the College Protocols ( HYPERLINK "http://www.scu.edu/cas/internal//protocols--procedures" http://www.scu.edu/cas/internal//protocols--procedures). Note: omissions of information on the Faculty Activities Report are not grounds for request for appeal. Name of Faculty: Date: Name of Department or Program: Evaluation Period: (September 1, 20XX through August 31, 20XX) Weightings: Teaching: % Scholarship: % Service: % Faculty Category: ___ Associate Professor ___ Professor Evaluation of Teaching The evaluation of teaching effectiveness should be measured through careful consideration of a broad range of evidence, both direct and indirect, including peer observations of teaching, syllabi, assessment tools, and other teaching materials, reliable measures of student achievement, student evaluations (numerical evaluation scores relative to department averages; representative comments from narrative evaluations), number of advisees; significant curriculum development or mentoring of student research. ___ Extraordinary (5) ___ Excellent to Extraordinary (4.5) ___ Excellent (4) ___ Good to Excellent (3.5) ___ Good (3) ___ Fair to Good (2.5) ___ Fair (2) ___ Below Expectations to Fair (1.5) ___ Below Expectations (1) Explanation of Evaluation and Comments on Teaching: Evaluation of Scholarship/Creative Work The evaluation of scholarship must: make clear what work is receiving full credit in this evaluation cycle; discuss the quality of all work as evidenced by indicators such as journal acceptance rates and impact factors, prestige of artistic venue or publisher, size of grant and prestige of funding source etc; discuss trajectory as evidenced by ongoing projects. ___ Extraordinary (5) ___ Excellent to Extraordinary (4.5) ___ Excellent (4) ___ Good to Excellent (3.5) ___ Good (3) ___ Fair to Good (2.5) ___ Fair (2) ___ Below Expectations to Fair (1.5) ___ Below Expectations (1) Explanation of Evaluation and Comments on Scholarship: Evaluation of Service The evaluation of service should highlight only significant contributions to the department, College, University, profession, or service to the community in ones professional capacity. ___ Extraordinary (5) ___ Excellent to Extraordinary (4.5) ___ Excellent (4) ___ Good to Excellent (3.5) ___ Good (3) ___ Fair to Good (2.5) ___ Fair (2) ___ Below Expectations to Fair (1.5) ___ Below Expectations (1) Explanation of Evaluation and Comments on Service: Overall Evaluation (round to the nearest half integer; please ask the associate dean for questions about rounding) ___ Extraordinary (5) ___ Excellent to Extraordinary (4.5) ___ Excellent (4) ___ Good to Excellent (3.5) ___ Good (3) ___ Fair to Good (2.5) ___ Fair (2) ___ Below Expectations to Fair (1.5) ___ Below Expectations (1) Developmental Feedback For associate professors this section must include, but is not limited to, feedback for progress toward promotion. For full professors, feedback should be appropriate to seniority and rank. Thank you for your contributions to the Department and the College of Arts and Sciences. Members of the Evaluation Committee: Signatures of Evaluation Committee Members: Reviewed by Associate Dean (no signature required):     PAGE 2 345@Wahimnopq|⺳yoee[TJh`7ha+5\ h^5\h ThPB5\h Th T5\h T56\]hPB56\] h5\h`7h8` 5\h`7h5\ hlDj5\ hPB5\ h`75\ hW5\h`7hJ:5\h`7h`5\h`7hj&5\h`7h}z5\h`7hlDj5\h`7h/R5\h`7ho5\45opT U l  . / `@ ^@ ` & Fgd)vgdGe & FgdXwSgd)$a$gdlDj$a$gdJeT U j l     1 7  @ A B C ŽŶ}y}rhaha h`7h]uh`7h]u5>* h`7hj&hWhZhzhz0J hshzjhzU h`7hJ:h}hz h`7h`7 h`7h)v h`7h0h`7hGe6 h`7hGeh`7hGe5h`7hj&5\h`7hv\h`7hXwS\h`7h)\h`7h)5\&     # * , - . / 0 : < > P Q S Z h m } ~  ĺ~~~wmf h`7hE8Nh`7hE8N5>* h`7h h`7hP h`7h]u h`7h?# h`7hB| h`7h$ h`7h"Nh`7h$5h`7h]u5>*h`7h}z5>* h`7hj& h`7hbO| h`7hJ hJ5>*h`7hJ5>*hJh>G h`7h>G h`7h}z(/ 0 ~  ?egd$gdJ: `^`gdlDj `^`gdJ: `^`gd]u `P^P` `gdJ  q XZz?exȾٖٖz h`7hlDj h`7hMR h`7h4 h`7h%~ h`7h$ hhi\h`7ht\ h"\h`7hJ:\ h`7h}zh`7hE8N5>*h`7h}z5>* hJ5>* h`7hJ: h`7ht h`7h>G h`7hE8N h`7hJh}z0Lghigd$gd` =RU0J+=LPbghü~wwsh}z h`7h%~ h`7hJ:h`7h`\h`7h;\\h`7h0\h`7ht\h`7h(\h`7hJ:\ h`7h$ h`7h}z h`5>*h`7h}z5>*h`7hlDj5 h`7h h`7hJhhj& h`7hP h`7hlDj-hi02<y{|  2AEW\]򕎎| h5>* h`7h`hP h`7hP h`7hlDj h`7h%~ h`7h$ h`7hJ:h`7hj&\h`7hJ:\ h`7h}zh`7h}z5h`7hE8N5h`7h}z5>*h`hJhh h`7hh h`7h.{| A\]  Ixgdj=gd$gdJ:     Ix   ,08Pwy}}}}}yyh`hsM h`7h?Thh`7h^>* h`7h;\ h`7h^ hJh^hJhJhJ5>*hJhlDj5>*hJh}z5>* h`7hj& h`7h%~ h`7hj= h`7h(J h`7h}z h`7hX=h h`7h:~.(){|}gdsM &d P &()Nz{|}žзаЬЖyhsmHnHujh?TUh?ThhujhuUh`7hsMhsMhJhsM h`7h;\ h`7h% h`7hsMh h`7ht h`7h}zh`7h>G56h`7h}z56 h`7h/R h`7h^ h`7h`/gdsM $$& #$a$d h`7h}zh}zhhJh?T ?0P1F:pJ/ =!"#$% Dp> 00P:p/R/ =!"#$% Dpx2 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XV~ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@66666_HmH nH sH tH L`L Normal1$7$8$H$CJ_HaJmH sH tH DA D Default Paragraph FontRiR  Table Normal4 l4a (k (No List <& < Footnote Reference:O: Level 10^`04@4 J+Header  !4 @"4 J+Footer  !H2H XdY Balloon TextCJOJQJ^JaJ6U`A6 Z Hyperlink >*B*phD RDPB0RevisionCJ_HaJmH sH tH PK![Content_Types].xmlN0EH-J@%ǎǢ|ș$زULTB l,3;rØJB+$G]7O٭Vj\{cp/IDg6wZ0s=Dĵw %;r,qlEآyDQ"Q,=c8B,!gxMD&铁M./SAe^QשF½|SˌDإbj|E7C<bʼNpr8fnߧFrI.{1fVԅ$21(t}kJV1/ ÚQL×07#]fVIhcMZ6/Hߏ bW`Gv Ts'BCt!LQ#JxݴyJ] C:= ċ(tRQ;^e1/-/A_Y)^6(p[_&N}njzb\->;nVb*.7p]M|MMM# ud9c47=iV7̪~㦓ødfÕ 5j z'^9J{rJЃ3Ax| FU9…i3Q/B)LʾRPx)04N O'> agYeHj*kblC=hPW!alfpX OAXl:XVZbr Zy4Sw3?WӊhPxzSq]y i  6 A6 !#######& h /   @X&!@ @ 0(  B S  ?H0(  iikmUl  zz||ahiikmnq17ABDuvxz  g i  8:=>@ADELMOQzz||} nDh"\0dDYI>ItY7h-*h^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHopp^p`OJQJo(hH@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHo^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoPP^P`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh"Y7hYI0dD@ @ T0^T`0OJQJo(           $R9                          j=A8` )N?#}z MRCf3sMP "C%A&8Y')J+a+E,F.`Z/*(46p5`7X=">PBNqG"NE8NKnN/RXwSWXdYZ)[;\t/b1cJdJeGehlDjhjlUkrkyof#pvaqbsm}stu]uvv)v?vw{g{bO|{=}%~{0| }Nm%x&gJ,;KooVY|4 t)}>*B| +j<u;-e$o:~ FPehiY`>xj&IUJ`b(>GzX(J T0 6s $xiQ^gOo^$0J:?Te`O}z@@Unknown G.[x Times New Roman5^Symbol3. *Cx Arial5. .[`)TahomaC.,*{$ Calibri Light7.*{$ Calibri?= .Cx Courier New;^MWingdingsA$BCambria Math" h gjڧ+:W[ W[ Y xxr 3q P ?}z2!xx .{ .Proposed Department of English Evaluation Form W. Atom YeeKatherine Aoki0         Oh+'0 (4 T ` l x'0Proposed Department of English Evaluation Form W. Atom Yee Normal.dotmKatherine Aoki7Microsoft Office Word@ @0R@t*3@*4W[  ՜.+,D՜.+,p, hp  'ҵ /Proposed Department of English Evaluation Form Title 8@ _PID_HLINKS'Ap97http://www.scu.edu/cas/internal//protocols--procedures  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012345678:;<=>?@BCDEFGHKRoot Entry FPG4M1Table8WordDocument6SummaryInformation(9DocumentSummaryInformation8ACompObjr  F Microsoft Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q